Next: Polymer RISM
Up: Integral equations for polymer
Previous: The Ornstein-Zernike equation and
We shall now generalize the results of the previous section to molecular
liquids . We view the liquid at first as being a mixture of
atomic liquids, containing as many components as there are atoms in the
molecule. Eq. (2.3) then simply generalizes to
|
(2.23) |
where
is the density of -atoms at a distance
r from a given -atom. We use capital
here
for reasons to become clear in a minute. Defining
|
(2.24) |
the OZ equation becomes
|
(2.25) |
Dividing by
and Fourier transforming we get in matrix
notation
|
(2.26) |
Here
is the diagonal matrix with elements
.
The transition to -space
is only for reason of simpler notation.
We of course know that the correlations between the atoms are partly due to
the fact that they form molecules. Therefore we write
where
stems from the intramolecular correlations and
from the intermolecular correlations .
In the ideal gas limit we may approximate
|
(2.28) |
which, when introduced into the OZ equation (2.26) yields
|
(2.29) |
We therefore write in general
|
(2.30) |
where
is called the intermolecular part of the direct
correlation function matrix. Introducing Eqs. (2.27) and (
2.30) into the OZ equation we get after some algebra
|
(2.31) |
where we have used the fact that
and
commute. For
pure molecular liquids this follows from the fact that
is equal to
the molecular density times the unit matrix. A proof for molecular mixtures
is a little bit more involved. Once we know the intramolecular correlation
we may calculate the intermolecular correlation from Eq. (
2.31) by using one of the closure relations
which we simply try in analogy with similar calculations on simple liquids.
Of course this may turn out to be a very crude approximation. Experience so
far shows that it works well as long as one is interested in describing the
local structure in the liquid. For very small values of the wavevector k,
or equivalently at large values of r problems occur which make
thermodynamic predictions unreliable.
We end this section with some remarks about the intramolecular correlation function. We Fouriertransform
Eq. (2.27), and next add
to each of its
elements, obtaining
|
(2.34) |
Here
is the density of -atoms
at a distance r from an -atom; when
the atom at
the origin does, by definition, not contribute to the density.
is defined in exactly the same way, with the proviso
that the -atom should be on another molecule than the -atom. Using these definitions we see that
is the density of -atoms at
a distance r from an -atom, where
and
should
be on the same molecule, and where, in the case
,
the atom
at the origin does not contribute to the density. So finally we conclude
that
is the density of -atoms at a
distance r from an -atom, with the -peak included when
.
In the latter case
,
because the total number of -atoms in each molecule equals one.
Next: Polymer RISM
Up: Integral equations for polymer
Previous: The Ornstein-Zernike equation and
W.J. Briels